What is true regarding the communication of an offer or acceptance to a principal's agent?

When communicating an offer or acceptance to a principal's agent, it is important to understand that doing so is considered equivalent to communicating directly with the principal. This principle is based on the legal concept of agency, where the agent acts on behalf of the principal. Therefore, an agent is authorized to receive communications related to offers and acceptances, which means that the principal is treated as if they have directly received the offer or acceptance.

This equivalence means that once the agent receives the communication, it creates a binding effect as if the principal had obtained this information personally. This enhances the efficiency of transactions, as it allows for smoother negotiations and transactions without requiring direct interaction with the principal each time an offer is made or accepted.

The other choices present scenarios that do not align with the established legal framework around agency. For instance, while writing can be important in some contexts, it is not strictly necessary for all binding communications. Ignoring an offer based on verbal communication also misrepresents the authority an agent holds. Lastly, while only a principal can ultimately accept an offer, the agent plays a crucial role in this process by facilitating communication and making the acceptance effective. Understanding these nuances is essential for navigating real estate transactions effectively.